FirstMind
FirstMind
Better people decisions
HOMERECRUITMENTEMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENTABOUTEDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION
TRY FOR FREE CONTACT US
Educational Universe›Talents›Problem Solver

Problem Solver | Executing

The problem solver talent is drawn to what is broken. People with this talent get genuine energy from diagnosing a failure and restoring something to working order, and comparatively little from things that are already working. They move towards the failing project, the difficult account, the underperforming team, often voluntarily and often when others are moving away.

[Insert video of Marie talking through all questions below structured]

How does it show up in your behavior?

  • They notice what is wrong first. Shown a finished piece of work, their eye goes to the flaw. This is automatic, not critical intent.
  • Energised by breakdown. A crisis produces focus and calm rather than stress.
  • Diagnostic instinct. They want to know the root cause, not just restore function, and they will keep digging until they find it.
  • They volunteer for the mess. The legacy system, the failing client, the team nobody wants.
  • Satisfaction comes from the fix, and it is complete once the thing works. Then interest drops sharply.
  • They persist past the point others give up, because an unsolved problem is genuinely uncomfortable to leave.
  • Restless when everything is fine. In a stable environment they will find something to fix, whether or not it needed fixing.
Important distinction: problem solver talent is about restoration, returning something to working order. It is not Innovative, which generates new options, nor Improving, which takes something already good and makes it excellent. These three are frequently confused and pull in genuinely different directions: Problem Solver is drawn to the broken thing, Improving is drawn to the strong thing.

What strengths come with having this talent as a top talent?

  • They rescue things. Projects, accounts, systems and teams that would otherwise have been written off.
  • Calm and effective in crisis, when most people’s performance degrades.
  • Root cause discipline. They fix the actual problem rather than the symptom, so it stays fixed.
  • They take on the unattractive work that carries real risk and no glamour, and which nobody else will touch.
  • Persistence. They will stay with an intractable problem long past the point of reasonable frustration.
  • Quality control. Their instinct to spot the flaw catches things before they reach a customer.
  • Turnaround credibility. A track record of fixing things makes them trusted with the next difficult situation.

How do you apply the strengths of this talent?

  1. Take the turnaround roles deliberately the failing project, the distressed account, the underperforming function, the technical debt nobody has addressed.
  2. Own root cause analysis, post-incident review and quality processes.
    • Formalising the instinct makes it visible and valued.
  3. Lead with the fix, not the fault.
    • “Here is what is wrong” lands as criticism; “here is what is wrong and here is how we address it” lands as help. This is the single most important adjustment for this profile.
  4. Say the positive explicitly.
    • Your silence on what is working is heard as disapproval, because you comment on flaws and not on function. State the good part out loud even though it feels unnecessary.
  5. Hand over once it works.
    • Your interest will drop after the fix; plan the transition rather than drifting away from it.
  6. Choose environments with a steady supply of real problems.
    • In a stable operation this talent manufactures problems, and that is worse for everyone than being under-used.

What challenges and blind spots come with having this as a top talent?

  • They are experienced as negative. Constantly identifying faults reads as criticism regardless of intent, and it accumulates.
  • Praise is rare from them, so people working for them feel their good work goes unregistered. This is the most common complaint about this profile as a manager.
  • They fix what was not broken, applying the instinct to things that were adequate and disrupting them.
  • Interest collapses after the fix. Long-term stewardship of a healthy operation bores them, and performance drops visibly.
  • They can create the problems they solve, particularly in a stable environment where the talent has no legitimate outlet.
  • Over-attachment to difficult cases, including people and accounts that should have been let go.
  • They may rescue rather than develop, stepping in to fix rather than letting someone learn by struggling.
  • Personal cost is under-counted. They take on the hardest, most draining work repeatedly and rarely account for what it costs them.

What other talents does this typically combine with?

  1. Problem solver + Analysing
    • Rigorous diagnosis. One is drawn to the failure, the other establishes what actually caused it. The natural profile for engineering, quality, forensic and investigative work. Together they can pursue root cause well past the point where the fix was already good enough.
  2. Problem solver + Controlling
    • The turnaround profile. One diagnoses, the other takes charge and imposes direction. Highly effective in crisis, restructuring and distressed situations. The combined force is considerable and the team can feel more corrected than led, worth pairing with someone who supplies encouragement.
  3. Problem solver + Developing
    • Fixing applied to people. They will not give up on a struggling team member, and will diagnose precisely what is holding them back. Excellent in coaching, remedial management and turnaround leadership. The risk is over-investing in someone who is not going to change, and framing a person as a problem to be solved.
  4. Problem solver + Responsible
    • They see the problem and cannot leave it, then own it until it is resolved. Exceptionally valuable and exceptionally overloaded, this combination attracts every difficult situation in the organisation, and refuses none of them.
  5. Problem solver + Positive (tension pairing)
    • One is drawn to what is wrong; the other emphasises what is right. Held together this is unusually effective, they identify the flaw and frame the fix as achievable, which is exactly what a demoralised team needs. Held badly it oscillates between critical and reassuring, and colleagues cannot tell which reading is genuine.

In which positions do we typically see this behaviour, and why does it benefit?

Typical roles

  • Turnaround, restructuring and distressed asset management, the archetype.
  • Engineering, maintenance, reliability and technical support, diagnosis and repair are the function.
  • Quality assurance, testing and incident response, finding what is wrong before someone else does.
  • Customer success and account recovery, the at-risk client is the one this talent will save.
  • Medicine, diagnostics and clinical practice, identifying cause from symptom.
  • Consulting and interim management, brought in specifically because something is not working.
  • Cybersecurity, forensics and investigation, the work is entirely about what has failed or been breached.
  • Legacy systems and technical debt work, nobody else volunteers for it.

Why it benefits

It recovers value that would otherwise be written off, prevents recurrence through root cause discipline, provides calm and capability precisely when a situation is deteriorating, and ensures the unglamorous but critical work actually gets done.

Where it struggles

Greenfield creation where there is nothing yet to fix, and long-term stewardship of a stable, healthy operation. In the latter, the talent has no legitimate target and tends to generate one, which is why a high Problem Solver profile in a well-running function is often a source of unnecessary disruption rather than a sign of a problem existing.

Read next